The vote is being called a "broad yes" by the Swiss to economic collaboration with Europe, and a mandate for pro-European parties in the Swiss government to increase ties. The news is already being taken as a sign that the financial crisis may lead to a more receptive attitude toward the EU and coordinated pan-European policies. With the Irish revote on the Lisbon Treaty just around the corner, many in Brussels are hoping this is a trend that will continue. But is the vote's outcome the result of changing EU attitudes in the face of the financial crisis, or was it simply the result of a skillful vote mobilisation effort on the ground by pro-EU groups?
Switzerland has a rather unusual arrangement with the EU. While it's not a member, it has a series of seven 'special accords' with the block that make it effectively a shadow member. It isn't an official member, so it doesn't have any representation in the European Parliament or Commission, but the accords oblige Switzerland to follow many areas of EU legislation. Free movement, which allows any EU citizen to work in any EU country, is one of those areas. However, now that EU membership hassuch a change must be put to a public vote (they basically have to have a public vote for everything in Switzerland). But here's where it gets tricky. The EU has made clear that Switzerland doesn't have the right to 'pick and choose' which parts of EU law it will follow, and under the infamous "guillotine clause," if the Swiss voted no to extending free movement to Bulgaria and Romania, all of their agreements with the EU would be torn up. Considering that the vast majority of Switzerland's trade is with the EU, and that non-Swiss EU citizens make up a huge percentage of its skilled workforce, a collapse in the accords would be catastrophic for the country's economy. So one has to ask, is this really a vote for increased EU ties, or a desire to maintain the status quo? And if it's now economically impossible for the Swiss to vote against policies enacted in Brussels, isn't this really just an illusory independence anyway?
A Sign of the Times?
So does the wide victory in Switzerland mean that people's fears about the financial crisis are going to make them less likely to snub the EU, for fear of the economic consequences? I've speculated that the economic turmoil in Ireland will likely make the Irish too scared to vote against the Lisbon Treaty again when the revote occurs later this year. It seems likely that the hold-up in approval by the Czech Parliament may also be resolved quickly now that the future looks so uncertain. On the other hand, many commentators have speculated that the recession could lead to an increase in populism and protectionism, which could put the European single market in jeopardy. The recent walk-outs in the UK and the one-day strike in France have certainly been a worrying sign in that direction.
For now though, Brussels has reason to be encouraged by the Swiss result.
3 comments:
In a referendum a resounding victory for good sense is when only four out of ten voters heed the call of extremists(?)
Even this "positive" result confirms my belief in representative democracy (with all its blemishes).
Amen to that, Gahnlaw. I'd be curious to ask those 40 percent whether they realized they were voting to annul all of Switzerland's treaties with the EU, and if so, why they thought that was a good course of action. The average citizen is just not knowledgable enough to make decisions like this, even in a well-educated country like Switzerland.
this is a good step for romanian and bulgarian nationals ,who are supposed to be european citizens but have not the same rights as the others .in uk for eg ,the rules concerning their work rights are almost racist .i think it had been better to deny acces to work then to invent such rules like being allowed to do only jobs that the british won't do this includes the high skilled too.it is shameful to treat people like this.one more eg.:the high skilled, if they they get a job,the employer must prove why he has chosen a romanian or bulgarian instead of a british and much more if you are interested to learn more about these discriminations see the home office uk web
Post a Comment